edit_summary: /* Glitch */
diff.text: OK, I realize now it's not the number of images, it's the way they are arranged. For some reason, the pages don't like images being in a certain position. Usually they only want them at the beginning of an article that is not overlapped by another image. I fixed all the ones so the pages are editable again. In doing so, the history of the Emerald article suggests that the glitch wasn't always there, as I was able to edit that before, but was unable to edit any but the imageless first draft of it on its history page. [[User:Ghostkaiba297|Ghostkaiba297]] 17:54, September 27, 2009 (UTC)