Update on Overleaf.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ Our example relies on the publicly available Civil Comments dataset \citep{cjada
|
|||||||
Each comment was labeled by up to ten manual annotators (although selected comments were labeled by even more annotators). Originally, the dataset represents \emph{toxicity} and \emph{disclosure} as proportions of annotators who labeled a comment as toxic or as disclosing aspects of personal identity including race and ethnicity.
|
Each comment was labeled by up to ten manual annotators (although selected comments were labeled by even more annotators). Originally, the dataset represents \emph{toxicity} and \emph{disclosure} as proportions of annotators who labeled a comment as toxic or as disclosing aspects of personal identity including race and ethnicity.
|
||||||
For our analysis, we converted these proportions into indicators of the majority view to transform both variables to a binary scale.
|
For our analysis, we converted these proportions into indicators of the majority view to transform both variables to a binary scale.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Our MLA method works in this scenario, as shown in \ref{fig:real.data.example.app}
|
Our MLA method works in this scenario, as shown in \ref{fig:real.data.example.app} below.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}[htbp!]
|
\begin{figure}[htbp!]
|
||||||
\centering
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user