Update on Overleaf.

TODO

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+
+DONE 1. As IRR is not even a major focus now: on Page 8, just keep the citation to "the Bible" (Krippendorf 2004) and remove all the other single/double-serving references: Gwat; Krippendor
+2007; Hayes & Krippendof.
+
+DONE 2. On page 9: I know you are super animated by the Wikipedia example. But I would argue reviewers would be more animated by the Perspective API. But whatever your choice, I would suggest
+keeping just one: Wikipedia / Perspective.
+
+DONE 3. I don't mind you cut Dobbrick et al. and keep the big name: Boukes et al., 2020
+
+DONE 4. pilny_using_2019 doesn't sound very important.
+
+
+5. This "citation dragon": \citep{obermeyer_dissecting_2019, kleinberg_algorithmic_2018, bender_dangers_2021, wallach_big_2019, noble_algorithms_2018, gillespie_custodians_2018}
+
+bender_dangers_2021, wallach_big_2019, noble_algorithms_2018, gillespie_custodians_2018 are single-serving. We must cut Tarleton Gillespie at least to save space, he has enough fame and
+doesn't need our citation. Maybe we can keep bender_dangers_2021, it's meaningful. Yes, bender_dangers is my favorite of these.
+
+
+6. another dragon: \citep[see]{carroll_measurement_2006, yi_handbook_2021, fuller_measurement_1987, buonaccorsi_measurement_2010}
+
+?cut fuller_measurement_1987
+
+7. I don't recommending removing the DAGs. Those lazy reviewers can skip the descriptions of the simulations and read the DAGs and pretend to be understanding the whole paper.
+
+By considering the above, probably we can cut around 1 to 2 pages (~37p).
+
+8. There are also some room to cut in the recommendations
+
+8a: Could we cut the caveat about the API and PL in R I? We don't want to promote the usage of PL and it would save 1/3 page.
+
+8b: I trimmed some words in R II. I think R II is quite compact already and it is super important.
+
+8c: Strategically for this ICA submission: Should we just promote MLE in R III, i.e. don't say anything about adding another adjacent method? Other than that, R III is quite compact also.
+
+8c: Recommendation IV: Cut the last paragraph for this submission. We are facing the same problem and learn from us.