mgaughan/adaptation-slr
1
0
Fork 0
Code

1/34 paper done for analysis

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
mgaughan 2025-07-08 17:11:23 -04:00
parent 0ee2b41792
commit 3a4c92642c
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
070725_papers_master.csv
View File

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ XDY5INZ6,conferencePaper,2018,"Lotter, Adriaan; Licorish, Sherlock A.; Savarimut
MBVCDT66,journalArticle,2023,"He, Runzhi; He, Hao; Zhang, Yuxia; Zhou, Minghui",Automating Dependency Updates in Practice: An Exploratory Study on GitHub Dependabot,10.1109/TSE.2023.3278129,,,,,
DGV2UJNM,conferencePaper,2020,"Zhou, Shurui; Vasilescu, Bogdan; Kästner, Christian",How has forking changed in the last 20 years? a study of hard forks on GitHub,10.1145/3377811.3380412,,,,,
QLSEMWTQ,journalArticle,2017,"Vendome, Christopher; Bavota, Gabriele; Penta, Massimiliano Di; Linares-Vásquez, Mario; German, Daniel; Poshyvanyk, Denys",License usage and changes: a large-scale study on gitHub,10.1007/s10664-016-9438-4,,,,,
5E2EWRQN,journalArticle,2020,"Abdalkareem, Rabe; Oda, Vinicius; Mujahid, Suhaib; Shihab, Emad",On the impact of using trivial packages: an empirical case study on npm and PyPI,10.1007/s10664-019-09792-9,,,,,
5E2EWRQN,journalArticle,2020,"Abdalkareem, Rabe; Oda, Vinicius; Mujahid, Suhaib; Shihab, Emad",On the impact of using trivial packages: an empirical case study on npm and PyPI,10.1007/s10664-019-09792-9,technical: code reuse: trivial package reuse: rationale – trivial packages provide well-implemented and tested code from the packaging ecosystem: enables adherence to the quality testing of the broader ecosystem,application developers: long-tenured JS and Python coders: largely professional but some independents,package managemeny systems: npm and PyPI: change adheres project to well-tested and implemented environment: ,mixed methods: pilot survey – data mining – follow up survey – data mining to validate survey responses: sampling from prior methods step: skews to university ,internal motivations for productiivty: many also stated that reuse was bad: paper spends a lot of time defining trivial packages
P3MTJWXP,conferencePaper,2022,"Zhang, Xunhui; Wang, Tao; Yu, Yue; Zeng, Qiubing; Li, Zhixing; Wang, Huaimin","Who, What, Why and How? Towards the Monetary Incentive in Crowd Collaboration: A Case Study of Github’s Sponsor Mechanism",10.1145/3491102.3501822,,,,,
DW9Q2W6V,conferencePaper,2022,"Businge, John; Zerouali, Ahmed; Decan, Alexandre; Mens, Tom; Demeyer, Serge; De Roover, Coen",Variant Forks - Motivations and Impediments,10.1109/SANER53432.2022.00105,,,,,
3Y9YKK5M,conferencePaper,2011,"Heinemann, Lars; Deissenboeck, Florian; Gleirscher, Mario; Hummel, Benjamin; Irlbeck, Maximilian",On the Extent and Nature of Software Reuse in Open Source Java Projects,,,,,,

1 Key Item Type Publication Year Author Title DOI Change characteristics (blue) Actors (purple) Environmental characteristics (green) Methods details (orange) Misc. (red)
29 MBVCDT66 journalArticle 2023 He, Runzhi; He, Hao; Zhang, Yuxia; Zhou, Minghui Automating Dependency Updates in Practice: An Exploratory Study on GitHub Dependabot 10.1109/TSE.2023.3278129
30 DGV2UJNM conferencePaper 2020 Zhou, Shurui; Vasilescu, Bogdan; Kästner, Christian How has forking changed in the last 20 years? a study of hard forks on GitHub 10.1145/3377811.3380412
31 QLSEMWTQ journalArticle 2017 Vendome, Christopher; Bavota, Gabriele; Penta, Massimiliano Di; Linares-Vásquez, Mario; German, Daniel; Poshyvanyk, Denys License usage and changes: a large-scale study on gitHub 10.1007/s10664-016-9438-4
32 5E2EWRQN journalArticle 2020 Abdalkareem, Rabe; Oda, Vinicius; Mujahid, Suhaib; Shihab, Emad On the impact of using trivial packages: an empirical case study on npm and PyPI 10.1007/s10664-019-09792-9 technical: code reuse: trivial package reuse: rationale – trivial packages provide well-implemented and tested code from the packaging ecosystem: enables adherence to the quality testing of the broader ecosystem application developers: long-tenured JS and Python coders: largely professional but some independents package managemeny systems: npm and PyPI: change adheres project to well-tested and implemented environment: mixed methods: pilot survey – data mining – follow up survey – data mining to validate survey responses: sampling from prior methods step: skews to university internal motivations for productiivty: many also stated that reuse was bad: paper spends a lot of time defining trivial packages
33 P3MTJWXP conferencePaper 2022 Zhang, Xunhui; Wang, Tao; Yu, Yue; Zeng, Qiubing; Li, Zhixing; Wang, Huaimin Who, What, Why and How? Towards the Monetary Incentive in Crowd Collaboration: A Case Study of Github’s Sponsor Mechanism 10.1145/3491102.3501822
34 DW9Q2W6V conferencePaper 2022 Businge, John; Zerouali, Ahmed; Decan, Alexandre; Mens, Tom; Demeyer, Serge; De Roover, Coen Variant Forks - Motivations and Impediments 10.1109/SANER53432.2022.00105
35 3Y9YKK5M conferencePaper 2011 Heinemann, Lars; Deissenboeck, Florian; Gleirscher, Mario; Hummel, Benjamin; Irlbeck, Maximilian On the Extent and Nature of Software Reuse in Open Source Java Projects