change characteristics 
- interaction of technical and procedural changing 
- self-eval of whether change worked or not?
actors 
- to what extent are the actors abstracted away from, their actions evaluated on their own merits
- seniority 
environment 
- is the gap directly articulate by the environment? or more competitive
	- e.g. compiance or popularity 
misc 
- framing the change as good?
- scope of the change vs. taken for granted 
- relevant intrinsic motivations? productivity for productivity's sake?

additional categories: 
- scope/relevance of the change
- how do the researchers focus on/identify intention?