change characteristics 
- interaction/union of technical and procedural change 
- NEED: is there any eval of whether change worked or not
- NEED: introduction of new thing or update to existing thing

actors 
- NEED: to what extent are the actors abstracted away from, their actions evaluated on their own merits
- NEED: seniority; what's the direction of the change in lay terms, bottom-up or top-down; also, is the change agent within the project or the ecosystem
- NEED a little bit more color regarding the operationalized definition of contirbutor or maintainer

methods: 
- NEED small-n case studies or broad data set 

environment 
- NEED the extent to which the project was aligned with the environment beforehand
- NEED: is the gap directly articulate by the environment? or more competitive/TFG
	- same as identifying antecedents or constant differnec
	- e.g. compiance or popularity 
misc 
- NEED framing the change as good?
- scope of the change vs. taken for granted 
- relevant intrinsic motivations? productivity for productivity's sake?
- NEED is the work descriptive or evaluative

additional categories: 
- scope/relevance of the change
- how do the researchers focus on/identify intention?
- NEED practitioner recommendations/broader impacts