374 lines
41 KiB
BibTeX
374 lines
41 KiB
BibTeX
|
||
@article{pereira-garcia_free_2020,
|
||
title = {{FREE} {SOFTWARE} {LAW} {PROJECTS} {IN} {COLOMBIA}},
|
||
volume = {35},
|
||
issn = {01026909},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/free-software-law-projects-colombia/docview/2401795429/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.1590/3510406/2020},
|
||
abstract = {This article covers an analysis of the bills presented before the Republic of Colombia Congress as efforts to regulate free software in the country, which were not successful in their legislative process. It analyzes whether the transits generated in the legislative proposals and the reasons why they were not approved, emphasizing the position of groups that defend free software. Therefore, a revision of legislative documents published in the Colombian official media was proposed, taking into account the approach of several actors involved in controversies from a virtual ethnography perspective, in which virtual spaces are included as a mechanism to understand the dynamics between the actors involved in the debate. In the end, it is affirmed that the failure of free software bills in Colombia highlights the interests of dominant groups that establish influential alliances in the course of technological regulation, in addition to a technological discourse with market interests.Alternate abstract:El presente artículo es un análisis sobre los proyectos de ley presentados ante el Congreso de la República con la intención de legislar el software libre en Colombia, los cuales no fueron exitosos en su trámite legislativo. Se analizan los tránsitos generados en las propuestas legislativas y las razones por las cuales estas no fueron aprobadas, haciendo énfasis en la postura de los grupos defensores del software libre. Con este fin se propuso la revisión de documentos legislativos publicados en los medios oficiales colombianos, además del abordaje a diversos actores involucrados en las controversias desde la perspectiva de la etnografía virtual, en la cual se abordan los espacios virtuales, como mecanismo para entender las dinámicas que ocurrieron entre diversos actores involucrados en el debate. Se afirma que el fracaso de los proyectos de ley sobre software libre en Colombia evidencia los intereses de grupos dominantes que establecen alianzas influyentes en el curso de la regulación tecnológica, además, de la alineación del discurso tecnológico con intereses mercantiles.Alternate abstract:L’article analyse l’échec des projets de lois soumis au Congrès de la république de Colombie sur la réglementation du logiciel libre dans le pays. Il examine le parcours des propositions législatives et les raisons de leur non-approbation tout en mettant l’accent sur la position des partisans du logiciel libre. L’objectif est d’étudier les documents législatifs publiés dans la presse officielle colombienne en tenant compte de l’approche de différents acteurs impliqués dans les controverses depuis la perspective de l’ethnographie virtuelle, où les espaces virtuels sont un mécanisme qui permet de comprendre les dynamiques entre les participants du débat. La recherche montre que l’échec des projets de loi sur le logiciel libre en Colombie est lié aux intérêts de groupes dominants qui établissent des alliances influentes au niveau de la régulation technologique et dont le discours technologique est dominé par des intérêts commerciaux.},
|
||
language = {Spanish},
|
||
number = {104},
|
||
journal = {Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais},
|
||
author = {Pereira-García, Alexander},
|
||
year = {2020},
|
||
note = {Place: Sao Paulo
|
||
Publisher: Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais - ANPOCS},
|
||
keywords = {Alliances, Colombia, ethnographie virtuelle, Ethnography, Etnografia Virtual, Etnografía Virtual, Free Software, Freeware, Legislação Tecnológica, Legislación Tecnológica, législation technologique, Logiciels libres, réglementation des logiciels, Regulamentação do software, Regular el software, Social Sciences: Comprehensive Works, Software, Software Libre, Software Livre, Software Regulation, Technological Legislation, Virtual Ethnography},
|
||
annote = {Copyright - © 2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2023-11-15},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Colombia},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{wajcman_uthallig_2016,
|
||
title = {Uthållig kreativitet - tills döden skiljer oss åt -- {Tre} faror, två demoner, tio budord},
|
||
volume = {53},
|
||
issn = {0038-0342},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/uthållig-kreativitet-tills-döden-skiljer-oss-åt/docview/1819291680/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
abstract = {Anförande vid Sociologidagarna, Uppsala 10–12 mars 2016, Stefan Svallfors, Södertörns högskola \& Institutet för framtidsstudier},
|
||
language = {Swedish},
|
||
number = {2},
|
||
journal = {Sociologisk Forskning},
|
||
author = {Wajcman, Judy},
|
||
year = {2016},
|
||
note = {Place: Lund
|
||
Publisher: Lunds Universitet},
|
||
keywords = {Creativity, Researchers, Sociology},
|
||
pages = {199},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2024-09-04},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{barron_free_2013,
|
||
title = {Free software production as critical social practice},
|
||
volume = {42},
|
||
issn = {03085147},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/free-software-production-as-critical-social/docview/2089824849/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.1080/03085147.2013.791510},
|
||
abstract = {This paper analyses the phenomenon of free and open source software (FOSS) in the light of Luc Boltanski and Ève Chiapello's The new spirit of capitalism. It argues that collaborative FOSS production by volunteer software developers is a species of critical social practice in Boltanski and Chiapello's sense: rooted in resistance to capitalist social relations, and yet also a source of values that justify the new routes to profitability associated with contemporary network capitalism. Advanced via collective projects that are sustained by hacker norms and privately legislated 'copyleft' law, the FOSS ethos is apparently antithetical to private property-based accumulation. Yet it can be shown to embody the 'new spirit of capitalism' in its most distilled form; moreover FOSS developers have instituted new forms of property and new modes of profit creation around software that are in the process of being adapted for use in other economic sectors. Meanwhile, the private law constraints on profit-seeking that have emerged from the FOSS movement are counteracting some of the social pathologies that accompany network capitalism only to consolidate others. The paper concludes by identifying likely bases for a renewal of critique given these realities.},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {4},
|
||
journal = {Economy and Society},
|
||
author = {Barron, Anne},
|
||
month = nov,
|
||
year = {2013},
|
||
note = {Place: Abingdon
|
||
Publisher: Taylor \& Francis LLC},
|
||
keywords = {Accumulation, Business And Economics, Capitalism, copyleft, Economic sectors, Economic theory, Free, Free and open-source software, free software, Free software, immaterial labour, Law, new spirit of capitalism, open source, Open source software, Private property, Profitability, Profits, Property, Renewal, reputational capital, Resistance, Social relations, Software},
|
||
pages = {597--625},
|
||
annote = {Copyright - © 2013 Taylor \& Francis},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2024-12-06},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{barron_free_2013-1,
|
||
title = {Free software production as critical social practice},
|
||
volume = {42},
|
||
issn = {0308-5147, 0308-5147},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/free-software-production-as-critical-social/docview/1512220562/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.1080/03085147.2013.791510},
|
||
abstract = {This paper analyses the phenomenon of free and open source software (FOSS) in the light of Luc Boltanski and Eve Chiapello's The new spirit of capitalism. It argues that collaborative FOSS production by volunteer software developers is a species of critical social practice in Boltanski and Chiapello's sense: rooted in resistance to capitalist social relations, and yet also a source of values that justify the new routes to profitability associated with contemporary network capitalism. Advanced via collective projects that are sustained by hacker norms and privately legislated 'copyleft' law, the FOSS ethos is apparently antithetical to private property-based accumulation. Yet it can be shown to embody the 'new spirit of capitalism' in its most distilled form; moreover FOSS developers have instituted new forms of property and new modes of profit creation around software that are in the process of being adapted for use in other economic sectors. Meanwhile, the private law constraints on profit-seeking that have emerged from the FOSS movement are counteracting some of the social pathologies that accompany network capitalism only to consolidate others. The paper concludes by identifying likely bases for a renewal of critique given these realities. Adapted from the source document.},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {4},
|
||
journal = {Economy and Society},
|
||
author = {Barron, Anne},
|
||
month = nov,
|
||
year = {2013},
|
||
note = {Publisher: Routledge/Taylor \& Francis, Abingdon UK},
|
||
keywords = {0715:social change and economic development, article, Capitalism, Computer Software, Cooperation, Economic Sectors, Law, Profits, social change \& economic development, Social Networks, Values, Volunteers},
|
||
pages = {597--625},
|
||
annote = {CODEN - ECSCAK},
|
||
annote = {Date revised - 2014-04-01},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2016-09-28},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Capitalism; Computer Software; Profits; Law; Social Networks; Volunteers; Values; Economic Sectors; Cooperation},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{conaldi_dual_2013,
|
||
title = {The dual network structure of organizational problem solving: {A} case study on open source software development},
|
||
volume = {35},
|
||
issn = {0378-8733, 0378-8733},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/dual-network-structure-organizational-problem/docview/1429630051/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
abstract = {We reconstruct the dual network structure generated by the association between 72 contributors and 737 software bugs engaged during a full development cycle of the free/open source software project Epiphany. Estimates of structural parameters of Exponential Random Graph Models for two-mode networks reveal the structural logics shaping activities of collaborative problem solving. After controlling for contributor-specific and software bug-specific characteristics, we find that contributors ('problem solvers') tend to distribute their activity over multiple software bugs. At the same time, however, we find that software bugs ('problems') tend not to share multiple contributors. This dual tendency toward de-specialization and exclusivity is sustained by specific local network dependencies revealed by our analysis which also suggests possible organizational mechanisms that may be underlying the puzzling macro-structural regularities frequently observed, but rarely explained, in the production of open source software. By combining these mechanisms with the influence of contributors characterized by different levels of involvement in the project, we provide micro-level evidence of structural interdependence between 'core' and 'peripheral' members identified exclusively on the basis of their individual level of contribution to the project. [Copyright Elsevier B.V.]},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {2},
|
||
journal = {Social Networks},
|
||
author = {Conaldi, Guido and Lomi, Alessandro},
|
||
month = may,
|
||
year = {2013},
|
||
note = {Publisher: Elsevier, Amsterdam The Netherlands},
|
||
keywords = {0665:complex organization, article, Computer Software, Cooperation, Organizational Structure, Property, social network analysis, Two-mode networks Exponential Random Graphs Free/open source software Organizational problem solving},
|
||
pages = {237--250},
|
||
annote = {CODEN - SONED4},
|
||
annote = {Date revised - 2013-09-01},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2016-09-28},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Computer Software; Property; Organizational Structure; Cooperation},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{bixler_toward_2012,
|
||
title = {Toward a {Community} of {Innovation} in {Community}-{Based} {Natural} {Resource} {Management}: {Insights} from {Open} {Source} {Software}},
|
||
volume = {71},
|
||
issn = {0018-7259, 0018-7259},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/toward-community-innovation-based-natural/docview/1283642756/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
abstract = {Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) is an environmental governance approach that deals with complex and interwoven ecological problems through a participatory environmental management framework. Practitioner, donor, and academic interest in this strategy is on the rise, and successful CBNRM organizations are experiencing internal and external pressures to help "transfer" their knowledge and experiences to other contexts and scales. If organized through the traditional top-down diffusion of innovation approach, many barriers to CBNRM transfer exist, beginning with organizational costs that may outweigh potential benefits. However, reframed as a more "open" and emergent process, the burdens of transfer may be reduced and benefits increased. We draw on an analogy from the Open Source Software (OSS) movement to suggest an organizational rationale for exchange and principles such as "porting," the "kernel," "copyleft," and "forking" that can guide CBNRM and for community-based organizations challenged to share their approach to conservation. Adapted from the source document.},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {3},
|
||
journal = {Human Organization},
|
||
author = {Bixler, R Patrick and Taylor, Peter Leigh},
|
||
month = oct,
|
||
year = {2012},
|
||
note = {Publisher: Society for Applied Anthropology, Oklahoma City OK},
|
||
keywords = {2656:environmental interactions, article, Community Organizations, community-based natural resource management watershed management transferability open source software, Environmental Factors, environmental interactions, Governance, Information Dissemination, Innovations, Knowledge, Natural Resources, Property, Resource Management},
|
||
pages = {234--243},
|
||
annote = {CODEN - HUORAY},
|
||
annote = {Date revised - 2013-02-01},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2016-09-28},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Resource Management; Natural Resources; Property; Innovations; Governance; Knowledge; Environmental Factors; Community Organizations; Information Dissemination},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{bixler_toward_2012-1,
|
||
title = {Toward a {Community} of {Innovation} in {Community}-{Based} {Natural} {Resource} {Management}: {Insights} from {Open} {Source} {Software}},
|
||
volume = {71},
|
||
issn = {00187259},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/toward-community-innovation-based-natural/docview/1055806751/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.17730/humo.71.3.200w0j1266306t79},
|
||
abstract = {Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) is an environmental governance approach that deals with complex and interwoven ecological problems through a participatory environmental management framework. Practitioner, donor, and academic interest in this strategy is on the rise, and successful CBNRM organizations are experiencing internal and external pressures to help "transfer" their knowledge and experiences to other contexts and scales. If organized through the traditional top-down diffusion of innovation approach, many barriers to CBNRM transfer exist, beginning with organizational costs that may outweigh potential benefits. However, reframed as a more "open" and emergent process, the burdens of transfer may be reduced and benefits increased. We draw on an analogy from the Open Source Software (OSS) movement to suggest an organizational rationale for exchange and principles such as "porting," the "kernel," "copyleft," and "forking" that can guide CBNRM and for community-based organizations challenged to share their approach to conservation. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {3},
|
||
journal = {Human Organization},
|
||
author = {Bixler, R Patrick and Taylor, Peter Leigh},
|
||
year = {2012},
|
||
note = {Place: Oklahoma City
|
||
Publisher: Taylor \& Francis Ltd.},
|
||
keywords = {Collaboration, Colorado, Community, Community engagement, Community organizations, Conservation, Diffusion, Environmental aspects, Environmental governance, Environmental resource management, Governance, Information dissemination, Innovations, Montana, Natural resource, Natural resource management, Open source, Open source software, Open-source software, Principles, Property, Public domain, Research, Research methodology, Resource management, Sciences: Comprehensive Works, Software, Startups, Studies, Success, Taylor, Peter, United States--US, Watershed management, Watersheds},
|
||
pages = {234--243},
|
||
annote = {CODEN - HUORAY},
|
||
annote = {Copyright - Copyright Society of Applied Anthropology Fall 2012},
|
||
annote = {Document feature - References; Maps},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2024-12-06},
|
||
annote = {Name - Colorado State University},
|
||
annote = {People - Taylor, Peter},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Montana; United States--US; Taylor, Peter; Colorado},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{carlotto_activist-driven_2011,
|
||
title = {Activist-driven innovation: an interpretive history of free software},
|
||
volume = {26},
|
||
issn = {01026909},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/activist-driven-innovation-interpretive-history/docview/1732127821/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.1590/S0102-69092011000200005},
|
||
abstract = {The understanding that there are two distinct regimes for the production of software is increasingly common in literature. What is not so common, and is therefore the most original contribution of this paper is, on the one hand, the historical approach to the configuration of those regimes and, on the other hand, the analysis of the factors determining the technical and commercial success of one regime over the other. Furthermore, we have worked with two additional hypotheses: first, that the development of free software historically belongs to the public/scientific knowledge production regime - i.e., free software mimicking the organization of the scientific community because it has its historical roots in it; and secondly, that in a "market competition" environment the public and scientific regime has proven more efficient and has therefore forced companies working in the private/business regime to adopt free or open source software.},
|
||
language = {Portuguese},
|
||
number = {76},
|
||
journal = {Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais},
|
||
author = {Carlotto, Maria Caramez and Ortellado, Pablo},
|
||
year = {2011},
|
||
note = {Place: Sao Paulo
|
||
Publisher: Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais - ANPOCS},
|
||
keywords = {Free software, Innovation, Inovação, Intellectual property, Knowledge production regimes, Logiciel libre, Propriedade intelectual, Propriété intéllectuelle, Regimes de produção de conhecimento, Régimes de production du savoir, Social Sciences: Comprehensive Works, Software livre},
|
||
pages = {77--102},
|
||
annote = {Copyright - Copyright Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais - ANPOCS 2011},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2023-06-14},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{carlotto_activist-driven_2011-1,
|
||
title = {Activist-driven innovation: an interpretive history of free software},
|
||
volume = {26},
|
||
issn = {0102-6909, 0102-6909},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/activist-driven-innovation-interpretive-history/docview/1037876933/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.1590/S0102-69092011000200005},
|
||
abstract = {The understanding that there are two distinct regimes for the production of software is increasingly common in literature. What is not so common, and is therefore the most original contribution of this paper is, on the one hand, the historical approach to the configuration of those regimes and, on the other hand, the analysis of the factors determining the technical and commercial success of one regime over the other. Furthermore, we have worked with two additional hypotheses: first, that the development of free software historically belongs to the public/scientific knowledge production regime -- i.e., free software mimicking the organization of the scientific community because it has its historical roots in it; and secondly, that in a 'market competition' environment the public and scientific regime has proven more efficient and has therefore forced companies working in the private/business regime to adopt free or open source software. Adapted from the source document.},
|
||
language = {Portuguese},
|
||
number = {76},
|
||
journal = {Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais},
|
||
author = {Carlotto, Maria Caramez and Ortellado, Pablo},
|
||
year = {2011},
|
||
note = {Publisher: ANPOCS, Sao Paulo Brazil},
|
||
keywords = {1772: sociology of science, article, Computer Software, Economic Development, Free software, Innovation, Innovations, Intellectual property, Knowledge production regimes, Markets, Property, Scientific Community, Scientific Knowledge, sociology of technology},
|
||
pages = {77--102},
|
||
annote = {CODEN - RBCSEQ},
|
||
annote = {Date revised - 2012-09-01},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2016-09-28},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Computer Software; Innovations; Markets; Economic Development; Property; Scientific Knowledge; Scientific Community},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{perez-bustos_building_2010,
|
||
title = {Building {Spaces} of {Exclusivity}: {An} {Ethnographic} {Approach} to {Indian} and {Colombian} {Women}'s {Role} and {Experience} in {Local} {Free} {Software} {Communities}},
|
||
issn = {0120-4807, 0120-4807},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/building-spaces-exclusivity-ethnographic-approach/docview/1364699164/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
abstract = {This paper aims to account for the ways women integrating the free software community in two countries from the global South negotiate with feminizing paradigms imposed to them by the collectives interested in popularizating free technologies. Through an ethnographic approach to vital experiences of women in the Indian collective Linux-Chix, and holding a dialog with the experiences of non-organized women in the free software community in Colombia, this paper suggests these negotiations are going to be materialized primarily in the constitution of survival strategies from which certain civilizing projects are particularly vindicated, some of which seem to promote a Western paradigm of female subjectivity. Adapted from the source document.},
|
||
language = {Spanish},
|
||
number = {69},
|
||
journal = {Universitas Humanistica},
|
||
author = {Perez-Bustos, Tania},
|
||
month = jan,
|
||
year = {2010},
|
||
note = {Publisher: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota Colombia},
|
||
keywords = {Females, India, Ethnography, article, Computer Software, Colombia, 0410: group interactions, 2983: feminist/gender studies, Free Software, women, feminism, social group identity \& intergroup relations (groups based on race \& ethnicity, age, \& sexual orientation), sociology of gender \& gender relations, Subjectivity},
|
||
pages = {115--137},
|
||
annote = {Date revised - 2013-06-01},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2016-09-28},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Females; Computer Software; Ethnography; India; Subjectivity; Colombia},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{leach_freedom_2009,
|
||
title = {Freedom {Imagined}: {Morality} and {Aesthetics} in {Open} {Source} {Software} {Design}},
|
||
volume = {74},
|
||
issn = {0014-1844, 0014-1844},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/freedom-imagined-morality-aesthetics-open-source/docview/61770588/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.1080/00141840902751188},
|
||
abstract = {This paper is about the interaction between the human imagination and technology among a self-described 'community': that of developers of Free or Open Source Software. I argue that the moral imagination observable in this phenomenon can be understood with reference to its emergence around specific methods of technical production. Principles of openness, truth, freedom and progress, which are also understood as central to the technical production of good software, are reinforced (as a ethical orientation) by their contribution to making 'good' software. A reciprocal dynamic ensues in which better software is seen as dependent on particular social practices and ideologies while these practices and ideologies are given salience by their success in fostering valuable production. Processes key to the generation of this social form are examined before a number of key features of the practice of programming, such as its often combative and individualistic character, and an absence of women in developer communities, are considered in the light of the analysis. Adapted from the source document.},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {1},
|
||
journal = {Ethnos},
|
||
author = {Leach, James and Nafus, Dawn and Krieger, Bernhard},
|
||
month = mar,
|
||
year = {2009},
|
||
note = {Publisher: Routledge/Taylor \& Francis, Abingdon UK},
|
||
keywords = {Ethics, Technology, Imagination, article, Property, Computer Software, sociology of technology, 1772:sociology of science, Ideologies, Morality, Social Dynamics},
|
||
pages = {51--71},
|
||
annote = {CODEN - ETNOAE},
|
||
annote = {Date revised - 2010-10-21},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2016-09-28},
|
||
annote = {Number of references - 51},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Computer Software; Ideologies; Property; Imagination; Ethics; Social Dynamics; Technology; Morality},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{mcinerney_technology_2009,
|
||
title = {Technology {Movements} and the {Politics} of {Free}/{Open} {Source} {Software}},
|
||
volume = {34},
|
||
issn = {0162-2439, 0162-2439},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/technology-movements-politics-free-open-source/docview/61706341/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.1177/0162243907309852},
|
||
abstract = {Many technologies in our everyday lives are expressions of deliberate and protracted political struggles among interested groups. While some technologies are inherently political, other technologies become politicized through competition among different groups and organizations. How do seemingly apolitical technologies become politicized? In this article, the author examines the case of the "circuit riders," a progressive technology movement in the United States that promotes information technology use among nonprofit and grassroots organizations, to show how a particular technology is politicized through field-level interactions. Applying and contributing to actor-network theory, the author finds that translation takes place as an organizational process by which actors associate the ideals of the technology in question with their political ideals and then attempt to enroll other actors to accept the resultant associations. Successful association depends on both discursive and organizational practices. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2009.]},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {2},
|
||
journal = {Science, Technology, and Human Values},
|
||
author = {McInerney, Paul-Brian},
|
||
month = mar,
|
||
year = {2009},
|
||
note = {Publisher: Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CA},
|
||
keywords = {Social Movements, Politics, Technology, Networks, article, Computer Software, sociology of technology, 1772:sociology of science, actor-network theory, free/open source software, politics, association, social movement},
|
||
pages = {206--233},
|
||
annote = {CODEN - STHVDQ},
|
||
annote = {Date revised - 2010-10-21},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2016-09-28},
|
||
annote = {Number of references - 85},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Computer Software; Politics; Networks; Social Movements; Technology},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{gallego_designing_2008,
|
||
title = {Designing a forecasting analysis to understand the diffusion of open source software in the year 2010},
|
||
volume = {75},
|
||
issn = {0040-1625, 0040-1625},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/designing-forecasting-analysis-understand/docview/61698239/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.1016/j.techfore.2007.02.002},
|
||
abstract = {Open source software (OSS) is being considered the new paradigm of software distribution. As contrasted with the traditional software marketing model, OSS pursues the freedom to have access to open source and offers several advantages to enterprises. These advantages include saving costs related to Information Systems and Technologies (IS/IT) and the possibility of adapting to changing organizational requirements. However, the recent forthcoming of OSS prevents us from knowing the real impact it has today on social and organizational fields. Having considered this obstacle, the authors have defined a foreseeable setting for OSS diffusion and adoption by means of a forecasting study based on the Delphi method for the year 2010. The findings reveal the levels of OSS diffusion for this year according to the main applications, geographic regions and industries. In a complementary manner, the authors have studied the elements of success as well as the most relevant obstacles for diffusing and adopting technological solutions based on OSS. [Copyright 2007 Elsevier Inc.]},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {5},
|
||
journal = {Technological Forecasting and Social Change},
|
||
author = {Gallego, M Dolores and Luna, Paula and Bueno, Salvador},
|
||
month = jun,
|
||
year = {2008},
|
||
note = {Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam The Netherlands},
|
||
keywords = {Diffusion, Information Technology, article, Computer Software, sociology of technology, Technological Innovations, 1772:sociology of science, Forecasting, Critical success factors, Technological Change},
|
||
pages = {672--686},
|
||
annote = {CODEN - TFSCB3},
|
||
annote = {Date revised - 2008-11-06},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2016-09-28},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Information Technology; Computer Software; Forecasting; Technological Innovations; Technological Change; Diffusion},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{gallego_designing_2008-1,
|
||
title = {Designing a forecasting analysis to understand the diffusion of open source software in the year 2010},
|
||
volume = {75},
|
||
issn = {00401625},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/designing-forecasting-analysis-understand/docview/205257823/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.1016/j.techfore.2007.02.002},
|
||
abstract = {Open source software (OSS) is being considered the new paradigm of software distribution. As contrasted with the traditional software marketing model, OSS pursues the freedom to have access to open source and offers several advantages to enterprises. These advantages include saving costs related to Information Systems and Technologies (IS/IT) and the possibility of adapting to changing organizational requirements. However, the recent forthcoming of OSS prevents us from knowing the real impact it has today on social and organizational fields. Having considered this obstacle, the authors have defined a foreseeable setting for OSS diffusion and adoption by means of a forecasting study based on the Delphi method for the year 2010. The findings reveal the levels of OSS diffusion for this year according to the main applications, geographic regions and industries. In a complementary manner, the authors have studied the elements of success as well as the most relevant obstacles for diffusing and adopting technological solutions based on OSS. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {5},
|
||
journal = {Technological Forecasting and Social Change},
|
||
author = {Gallego, M Dolores and Luna, Paula and Bueno, Salvador},
|
||
month = jun,
|
||
year = {2008},
|
||
note = {Place: New York
|
||
Publisher: Elsevier Science Ltd.},
|
||
keywords = {Open source software, Sociology, Studies, Open source, Software, Open-source software, Technology adoption, Technology transfer, 5240:Software \& systems, 9130:Experiment/theoretical treatment, Public domain, 7100:Market research, Delphi method, Software distribution, Success factors, Forecasting techniques},
|
||
pages = {672},
|
||
annote = {Copyright - Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2008},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2024-12-06},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{noauthor_review_2007,
|
||
title = {Review: {Niels} {C}. {Taubert} (2006). {Produktive} {Anarchie}? {Netzwerke} freier {Softwareentwicklung} [{Productive} {Anarchy}? {Networks} of {Open} {Source} {Software} {Development}]},
|
||
volume = {8},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/review-niels-c-taubert-2006-produktive-anarchie/docview/869226706/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
abstract = {Open source software is software designed to allow anyone to use and make changes in the software. This practice often renders the product superior to more centralized models such as those used in commercial software companies. How is such a phenomenon possible in a time where nothing seems to be acquirable save by purchase? Niels C. TAUBERT's book Productive Anarchy? Networks of Open Source Software Development aims at a sociological understanding of the prerequisites and conditions for the success of open source software. One of the conclusions of TAUBERT's book is that the process of open software development needs to be understood as adaptive and experimental. A continuous feedback between the context of production and the context of application is the basis for robust and successful software production. One of the surprising results of the book is that the most important requirement for this feedback process is a set of norms--neutrality, communism, disinterestedness, and universalism--norms that Robert MERTON associated with academic science in the 1940s. If TAUBERT is right that these norms are to be found outside the world of institutional science in open source software development projects today, then his case study can be seen as an indicator for a new form of knowledge production in the 21st century, where the social relevance and responsibility of a research process are keys to successful innovation. With this book, which deserves a wide readership, TAUBERT makes an important contribution to our understanding of the successful organization of technology development. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0701109},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {1},
|
||
journal = {Forum : Qualitative Social Research},
|
||
year = {2007},
|
||
note = {Place: Berlin
|
||
Publisher: Freie Universität Berlin},
|
||
keywords = {Innovation, Open-source software, Knowledge economy, Software development, Software industry, Social Sciences: Comprehensive Works, Naturally occurring radioactive material, Norm, Robert Merton},
|
||
annote = {Copyright - Copyright Freie Universität Berlin 2007},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2024-08-26},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{gross_review_2007,
|
||
title = {Review: {Niels} {C}. {Taubert} [2006]. {Productive} {Anarchy}? {Networks} of {Open} {Source} {Software} {Development}},
|
||
volume = {8},
|
||
issn = {1438-5627, 1438-5627},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/review-niels-c-taubert-2006-productive-anarchy/docview/61664267/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
abstract = {Open source software is software designed to allow anyone to use and make changes in the software. This practice often renders the product superior to more centralized models such as those used in commercial software companies. How is such a phenomenon possible in a time where nothing seems to be acquirable save by purchase? Niels C. TAUBERT's book Productive Anarchy? Networks of Open Source Software Development aims at a sociological understanding of the prerequisites and conditions for the success of open source software. One of the conclusions of TAUBERT's book is that the process of open software development needs to be understood as adaptive and experimental. A continuous feedback between the context of production and the context of application is the basis for robust and successful software production. One of the surprising results of the book is that the most important requirement for this feedback process is a set of norms-neutrality, communism, disinterestedness, and universalism-norms that Robert MERTON associated with academic science in the 1940s. If TAUBERT is right that these norms are to be found outside the world of institutional science in open source software development projects today, then his case study can be seen as an indicator for a new form of knowledge production in the 21st century, where the social relevance and responsibility of a research process are keys to successful innovation. With this book, which deserves a wide readership, TAUBERT makes an important contribution to our understanding of the successful organization of technology development. References. Adapted from the source document.},
|
||
language = {German},
|
||
number = {1},
|
||
journal = {Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research},
|
||
author = {Gross, Matthias},
|
||
month = jan,
|
||
year = {2007},
|
||
note = {Publisher: Free University of Berlin, Germany},
|
||
keywords = {Norms, Social Networks, article, Computer Software, Technological Innovations, research methods/tools, 0104: methodology and research technology, Computer Assisted Research, open source software, science studies, innovation, scientific ethos},
|
||
annote = {Date revised - 2007-08-02},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2016-09-28},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Computer Software; Computer Assisted Research; Technological Innovations; Social Networks; Norms},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{osterloh_trust_2004,
|
||
title = {Trust and {Community} in {Open} {Source} {Software} {Production}},
|
||
volume = {26},
|
||
issn = {0171-5860, 0171-5860},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/trust-community-open-source-software-production/docview/60088240/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
abstract = {Open source software production is a successful new innovation model which disproves that only private ownership of intellectual property rights fosters innovations. It is analyzed here under which conditions the open source model may be successful in general. We show that a complex interplay of situational, motivational, \& institutional factors have to be taken into account to understand how to manage the 'tragedy of the commons' as well as the 'tragedy of the anticommons'. It is argued that the success of this new innovation model is greatly facilitated by a well balanced portfolio of intrinsic \& extrinsic motivation, low costs for contributors \& governance mechanisms that do not crowd out intrinsic motivation. 96 References. Adapted from the source document.},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {1},
|
||
journal = {Analyse \& Kritik},
|
||
author = {Osterloh, Margit and Rota, Sandra},
|
||
month = dec,
|
||
year = {2004},
|
||
keywords = {Motivation, Copyrights, Public Goods, Trust, Property Rights, article, Computer Software, sociology of technology, Technological Innovations, 1772:sociology of science, High Technology Industries},
|
||
pages = {279--301},
|
||
annote = {Date revised - 2007-10-30},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2016-09-28},
|
||
annote = {Number of references - 91},
|
||
annote = {SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Trust; High Technology Industries; Technological Innovations; Motivation; Computer Software; Copyrights; Property Rights; Public Goods},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@article{osterloh_trust_2004-1,
|
||
title = {Trust and {Community} in {Open} {Source} {Software} {Production}*},
|
||
volume = {26},
|
||
issn = {01715860},
|
||
url = {http://turing.library.northwestern.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/trust-community-open-source-software-production/docview/208532393/se-2?accountid=12861},
|
||
doi = {10.1515/auk-2004-0115},
|
||
abstract = {Open source software production is a successful new innovation model which disproves that only private ownership of intellectual property rights fosters innovations. It is analyzed here under which conditions the open source model may be successful in general. We show that a complex interplay of situational, motivational, and institutional factors have to be taken into account to understand how to manage the 'tragedy of the commons' as well as the 'tragedy of the anticommons'. It is argued that the success of this new innovation model is greatly facilitated by a well balanced portfolio of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, low costs for contributors and governance mechanisms that do not crowd out intrinsic motivation.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]},
|
||
language = {English},
|
||
number = {1},
|
||
journal = {Analyse und Kritik},
|
||
author = {Osterloh, Margit and Rota, Sandra},
|
||
year = {2004},
|
||
note = {Place: Stuttgart
|
||
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH},
|
||
keywords = {Open source software, Motivation, Community, Open source, Trust, Social Sciences: Comprehensive Works},
|
||
pages = {279--301},
|
||
annote = {Copyright - Copyright Lucius \& Lucius Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Dec 2004},
|
||
annote = {Document feature - references},
|
||
annote = {Last updated - 2023-11-19},
|
||
}
|