fix an ordering bug with grade creation
This commit is contained in:
parent
78ac188f04
commit
a50468cac2
@ -10,21 +10,20 @@ rownames(d) <- d$unique.name
|
|||||||
call.list$timestamp <- as.Date(call.list$timestamp)
|
call.list$timestamp <- as.Date(call.list$timestamp)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## class-level variables
|
## class-level variables
|
||||||
question.grades <- c("PLUS"=100, "CHECK"=100-(50/3.3), "MINUS"=100-(50/(3.3)*2))
|
gpa.point.value <- 50/(4 - 0.7)
|
||||||
missed.question.penalty <- (50/3.3) * 0.2 ## 1/5 of a full point on the GPA scale
|
question.grades <- c("PLUS"=100, "CHECK"=100-gpa.point.value, "MINUS"=100-(gpa.point.value*2))
|
||||||
|
missed.question.penalty <- gpa.point.value * 0.2 ## 1/5 of a full point on the GPA scale
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## inspect set the absence threashold
|
## inspect set the absence threashold
|
||||||
ggplot(d) + aes(x=absences) + geom_histogram(binwidth=1, fill="white",color="black")
|
ggplot(d) + aes(x=absences) + geom_histogram(binwidth=1, fill="white",color="black")
|
||||||
## absence.threshold <- median(d$absences)
|
absence.threshold <- median(d$absences)
|
||||||
absence.threshold <- 4 ## TODO talk about this
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## inspect and set the questions cutoff
|
## inspect and set the questions cutoff
|
||||||
## questions.cutoff <- median(d$num.calls)
|
## questions.cutoff <- median(d$num.calls)
|
||||||
## median(d$num.calls)
|
## median(d$num.calls)
|
||||||
## questions.cutoff <- nrow(call.list) / nrow(d) ## TODO talk about this
|
## questions.cutoff <- nrow(call.list) / nrow(d) ## TODO talk about this
|
||||||
## first these are the people were were not called simply because they got unlucky
|
## this is the 95% percentile based on simulation in simulation.R
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## this is the 95% percentile based on simulation in simulation.R
|
|
||||||
questions.cutoff <- 4
|
questions.cutoff <- 4
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## show the distribution of assessments
|
## show the distribution of assessments
|
||||||
@ -36,8 +35,11 @@ prop.table(table(call.list.full$answered))
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
total.questions.asked <- nrow(call.list)
|
total.questions.asked <- nrow(call.list)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## find out how man questions folks have present/absent for
|
## find out how man questions folks have present/absent for.
|
||||||
##########################################################
|
##
|
||||||
|
## NOTE: this is currently only for informational purposes and is NOT
|
||||||
|
## being used to compute grants in any way.
|
||||||
|
########################################################################
|
||||||
calls.per.day <- data.frame(day=as.Date(names(table(call.list$timestamp))),
|
calls.per.day <- data.frame(day=as.Date(names(table(call.list$timestamp))),
|
||||||
questions.asked=as.numeric(table(call.list$timestamp)))
|
questions.asked=as.numeric(table(call.list$timestamp)))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -67,7 +69,7 @@ d$prop.asked.quant <- cut(d$prop.asked, right=FALSE, breaks=c(prop.asks.quantile
|
|||||||
labels=names(prop.asks.quantiles)[1:(length(prop.asks.quantiles))])
|
labels=names(prop.asks.quantiles)[1:(length(prop.asks.quantiles))])
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## generate grades
|
## generate grades
|
||||||
##########################################################
|
########################################################################
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## print the median number of questions for (a) everybody and (b)
|
## print the median number of questions for (a) everybody and (b)
|
||||||
## people that have been present 75% of the time
|
## people that have been present 75% of the time
|
||||||
@ -92,45 +94,44 @@ gen.part.grade <- function (x.unique.name) {
|
|||||||
tmp <- do.call("rbind", lapply(d$unique.name, gen.part.grade))
|
tmp <- do.call("rbind", lapply(d$unique.name, gen.part.grade))
|
||||||
d <- merge(d, tmp)
|
d <- merge(d, tmp)
|
||||||
rownames(d) <- d$unique.name
|
rownames(d) <- d$unique.name
|
||||||
|
d$part.grade <- d$base.grade
|
||||||
## apply the penality for number of days we called on them and they were gone
|
|
||||||
d$part.grade <- d$base.grade - d$missing.in.class.days * missed.question.penalty
|
|
||||||
d$part.grade.orig <- d$part.grade
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## first we handle the zeros
|
## first we handle the zeros
|
||||||
## step 1: first double check the people who have zeros and ensure that they didn't "just" get unlucky"
|
## step 1: first double check the people who have zeros and ensure that they didn't "just" get unlucky"
|
||||||
d[d$num.calls == 0,]
|
d[d$num.calls == 0,]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## set those people to 0 :(
|
## set those people to 0 :(
|
||||||
d[d$num.calls == 0]
|
|
||||||
d$part.grade[d$num.calls == 0] <- 0
|
d$part.grade[d$num.calls == 0] <- 0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## step 2: identify the people who were were not asked "enough" questions but were unlucky/lucky
|
## step 2: identify the people who were were not asked "enough"
|
||||||
## penalized.unique.names <- d$unique.name[d$num.calls < median(d$num.calls) & d$absences > median(d$absences)]
|
## questions but were unlucky/lucky
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## first these are the people were were not called simply because they got unlucky
|
## first this just prints out are the people were were not called
|
||||||
|
## simply because they got unlucky
|
||||||
d[d$num.calls < questions.cutoff & d$absences < absence.threshold,]
|
d[d$num.calls < questions.cutoff & d$absences < absence.threshold,]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## first these are the people were were not called simply because they got unlucky
|
## these are the people were were not called simply unlucky (i.e.,
|
||||||
|
## they were not in class very often)
|
||||||
penalized.unique.names <- d$unique.name[d$num.calls < questions.cutoff & d$absences > absence.threshold]
|
penalized.unique.names <- d$unique.name[d$num.calls < questions.cutoff & d$absences > absence.threshold]
|
||||||
d[d$unique.name %in% penalized.unique.names,]
|
d[d$unique.name %in% penalized.unique.names,]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## now add "zeros" for every questions that is below the normal
|
## now add "zeros" for every questions that is below the normal
|
||||||
d[as.character(penalized.unique.names),"part.grade"] <- ((
|
d[as.character(penalized.unique.names),"part.grade"] <- (
|
||||||
(questions.cutoff - d[as.character(penalized.unique.names),"num.calls"] * 0) +
|
(d[as.character(penalized.unique.names),"num.calls"] * d[as.character(penalized.unique.names),"part.grade"])
|
||||||
(d[as.character(penalized.unique.names),"num.calls"] * d[as.character(penalized.unique.names),"part.grade"]) )
|
|
||||||
/ questions.cutoff)
|
/ questions.cutoff)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
d[as.character(penalized.unique.names),]
|
d[as.character(penalized.unique.names),]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## apply the penality for number of days we called on them and they were gone
|
||||||
|
d$part.grade <- d$part.grade - d$missing.in.class.days * missed.question.penalty
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## TODO ensure this is right. i think it is
|
## TODO ensure this is right. i think it is
|
||||||
## map part grades back to 4.0 letter scale and points
|
## map part grades back to 4.0 letter scale and points
|
||||||
d$part.4point <- round((d$part.grade / (50/3.3)) - 2.6, 2)
|
d$part.4point <- round((d$part.grade / gpa.point.value) - ((100 / gpa.point.value) - 4), 2)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
d[sort.list(d$part.4point, decreasing=TRUE),
|
d[sort.list(d$part.4point, decreasing=TRUE),
|
||||||
c("unique.name", "short.name", "num.calls", "absences", "part.4point")]
|
c("unique.name", "short.name", "num.calls", "absences", "part.4point")]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## writing out data to CSV
|
## writing out data to CSV
|
||||||
d.print <- merge(d, myuw[,c("StudentNo", "FirstName", "LastName", "UWNetID")],
|
d.print <- merge(d, myuw[,c("StudentNo", "FirstName", "LastName", "UWNetID")],
|
||||||
by.x="unique.name", by.y="StudentNo")
|
by.x="unique.name", by.y="StudentNo")
|
||||||
@ -145,3 +146,4 @@ for (id in d$unique.name) {
|
|||||||
d.print$unique.name[d.print$unique.name == id],
|
d.print$unique.name[d.print$unique.name == id],
|
||||||
sep=""))
|
sep=""))
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
k
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user